AntiSLAPPLaws.com
Recent Changes - Search:
  • Jay Adkisson
  • HomePage
  • UPEPA and Anti-SLAPP Articles by Jay Adkisson
  • Anti-SLAPP Law Modernized: The Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, Jay Adkisson (2022)

UPEPA SECTIONS

  • Prefatory
  • 1 Short Title
  • 2 Scope
  • 3 Special Motion
  • 4 Stay
  • 5 Hearing
  • 6 Proof/Evidence
  • 7 Dismissal/Striking
  • 8 Ruling
  • 9 Appeal
  • 10 Costs/Fees
  • 11 Construction
  • 12 Uniformity
  • 13-17 Miscellaneous

STATE LAWS

  • Boldface = Has UPEPA
  • Italics = Has No Act
    • Alabama
    • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Distr. Columbia
  • Florida
  • Guam
  • Georgia
  • Hawaii
    • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
    • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
  • Minnesota
    • Mississippi
  • Missouri
    • Montana
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York
    • North Carolina
    • North Dakota
    • Ohio
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Puerto Rico
  • Rhode Island
    • South Carolina
    • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
    • US Virgin Isls.
  • Utah
  • Vermont
    • Virginia
  • Washington
    • West Virginia
    • Wisconsin
    • Wyoming
  • Federal Legislation (Proposed)

  • UPEPA Court Opinions


CONTACT

  • Jay D. Adkisson
  • ADKISSON PITET LLP
  • 6671 South Las Vegas Blvd. Suite 210
  • Las Vegas, NV 89119
  • Ph: (702) 953-9617
  • EMail: jay [at] jayad.com



OTHER WEBSITES BY JAY ADKISSON

  • Captive Insurance


  • Charging Orders


  • Creditor Debtor


  • About Jay Adkisson


  • Protected Series LLCs


  • Voidable Transactions



AllSitePages

  • AllPages
  • MyCustomTemplates
  • WikiSandbox
  • XFR



edit SideBar

  • View
  • Edit
  • History
  • Print
  • Backlinks
Site /

UPEPAOpinions

  • Boshears v. People Connect, Inc., 2022 WL 888300 (W.D.Wa., March 25, 2022).
  • Briggs v. Eden Council, 19 Cal.4th 1106 (1999).
  • City of Cotati v. Cashman, 29 Cal.4th 69 (2002).
  • Equilon Enterprises, LLC v. Consumer Cause, Inc., 29 Cal.4th 53, 52 P.3d 685 (2002).
  • Gates v. Discovery Communications, Inc., 34 Cal.4th 679, 101 P.3d 552, 21 Cal.Rptr.3d 663 (2004).
  • Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche, 31 Cal.4th 728, 74 P.3d 737 (2003).
  • Ketchum v. Moses, 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001).
  • Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hosp. Dist., 39 Cal.4th 192, 138 P.3d 193, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 41 (2006).
  • Navellier v. Sletten, 29 Cal.4th 82, 52 P.3d 703 (2002).
  • Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris-Cerullo World Evangelism, 4 Cal.5th 637 (Cal., Mar. 22, 2018).
  • Project Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 2022 WL 1555047 (W.D.Wa., May 17, 2022).
  • Rusheen v. Cohen, 37 Cal.4th 1048, 128 P.3d 713, 39 Cal.Rptr.3d 516 (2006).
  • Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif, 39 Cal.4th 260, 139 P.3d 30, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 638 (2006).
  • TEXT
  • Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino, 35 Cal.4th 180, 106 P.3d 958, 25 Cal.Rptr.3d 298 (2005).
  • Wilson v. Parker, Covert & Chidester, 28 Cal.4th 811 (2002).

Project Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 2022 WL 1555047 (W.D.Wa., May 17, 2022).

Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on May 21, 2022, at 04:37 PM